RediMind Review & Test Results

By Richard Davidson, October 20 2025
What Is RediMind?
RediMind is marketed as a “natural cognitive enhancer,” though most of its ads lean hard on memory claims. It’s made by Nutreance LLC, a small outfit that also sells sleep and anxiety formulas. The marketing style is punchy, with plenty of superlatives and “best brain supplement” talk, but the product itself perhaps doesn’t justify that level of hype.
I’ll keep this tight: I went through the formula and the evidence behind it, and I don’t see support for all the sweeping promises Nutreance makes. The dosing and ingredient choices don’t quite line up with what I’d expect from a top-tier memory supplement. Below, I’ll break down where it falls short and point you toward options that are better built and more transparent.
Key Points
- RediMind is a very basic brain supplement. It contains extremely small amounts of a handful of ingredients, all of which are dosed below the amounts required to be effective.
- RediMind's overly aggressive advertising combined with a lackluster product raises questions over the company's ethics.
- I didn't experience any perceivable brain benefits during my trial period with the product.
- The amount of each ingredient included in RediMind is purposely hidden behind a proprietary blend to mask ineffective dosages.
- A much more effective alternative is ThinkEase. It's the brain supplement that performed best in my testing. It's transparently formulated and has clinically proven amounts of each ingredient.

How Does RediMind Work?
It's important for me to start this section with a clear message - RediMind doesn't work, at least not in any meaningful way. However, I'll do my best to explain the science behind the product's formulation and how this compares to RediMind's claims. Nutreance claim that they use the optimal combination of 5 ingredients required to boost memory and cognition, by increasing the brain's ability to produce acetylcholine and in turn increase the neural connections in the brain. This sounds compelling and quite persuasive, but there are several issues with this claim as I'll explain.
Firstly, as I've already touched on, RediMind simply doesn't use enough of each ingredient in its formulation to be effective. A 350mg serving size means there's only a very small amount of each ingredient, far less than has been shown as necessary in scientific studies. This means that from a purely scientific standpoint RediMind is almost certain not to work in the way Nutreance claim. RediMind's total serving size is less than the amount of Lion's Mane required to be effective (500mg of Lion's Mane is needed [1], more than RediMind's entire 350mg serving size). In fact, the same is true for the amount of Bacopa Monnieri needed - this almost equivalent to RediMind's entire serving size, yet it's one of five ingredients which each need similar amounts to work [2]. Alpha GPC requires an even greater dose. I can't actually tell how much of each ingredient RediMind uses due to the use of an opaque proprietary blend, something which further undercuts trust in the brand and its claims.
Just as critically, the way RediMind explain how the brain works is factually incorrect. The brand claims that increasing acetylcholine will lead to increased neural connections and in turn improved memory, this is oversimplified to the point of being factually incorrect. It's certainly true that acetylcholine does have an important role to play in the workings of the brain, but there are many other factors at play. These include, for example, a range of other neurotransmitters, structures within the brain and even long-term neuron changes. Changes in one single chemical (which it's doubtful RediMind would influence due to its low serving size) won't make a tangible difference to overall cognitive function, brain plasticity or memory in isolation.
RediMind Ingredients
Redimind Proprietary Blend 350mg (Bacopa Monnieri Powder, Ginkgo Biloba Powder, Alpha GPC 50%, Lion's Mane Powder, Hyperzine A)
Other Ingredients: Vegetable Capsule, Magnesium Stearate, Microcrystaline Cellulose, Dicalcium Phosphate
RediMind Ingredients Versus Top Alternative
Ingredient | RediMind | ThinkEase |
---|---|---|
Vitamin B6 | None | 2.5mg |
Vitamin B9 | None | 100mcg |
Vitamin B12 | None | 7.5mcg |
Acetyl L-Carnitine | None | 750mg |
Lion's Mane | Undisclosed (ineffective) | 550mg |
Bacopa Monnieri | Undisclosed (likely ineffective) | 300mg |
N-Acetyle L-Tyrosine | None | 275mg |
Citicoline | None | 250mg |
L-Theanine | None | 200mg |
Rhodiola Extract | None | 200mg |
PQQ | None | 10mg |
Lutein | None | 10mg |
Phosphatidylserine | None | 100mg |
Pine Bark Extract | None | 75mg |
Spanish Sage | None | 2mg |
Alpha GPC | Undisclosed (ineffective) | None |
Huperzine A | Undisclosed (likely ineffective) | None |
Ginkgo Biloba | Undisclosed (likely ineffective) | Cell |
Clean Ingredient Profile | No | Yes |
Premium Grade Capsule | No | Yes |
Scientific Basis
The ingredients in RediMind are few in number compared to more effective nootropic supplements. Having said that, the five ingredients used are well established as proven nootropics, but each one requires a specific amount to be effective in supporting the brain [3]. Starting with Bacopa Monnieri, it's one of the most widely studied nootropic substances, with research consistently finding it can improve the brain's ability to consolidate memories and process information. Its effects typically build over time, so sustained supplementation is important to realizing its full benefits. However, studies have consistently shown that 300mg of Bacopa Monnieri is required to realize its benefits for the brain [4]. Herein lies the issue, RediMind's total blend is barely more than the amount required for just one ingredient. What's more RediMind doesn't appear to use a standarized form of Bacopa, meaning the effectiveness of the likely small amount of Bacopa is further reduced.
Even more concerningly, RediMind includes Lion's Mane in its proprietary blend. Lion's Mane is a fantastic nootropic ingredient, but to be effective a minimum of 500mg is required daily. This is more than the entire amount of all the ingredients in RediMind. This means we can be absolutely certain that the amount of Lion's Mane included in RediMind is far too low to have any tangible benefit. This is pure marketing and it would be misleading to suggest the Lion's Mane in RediMind will have any discernible benefit for the brain [5]. Lion's Mane seems to be included entirely to help sell the product as the amount used is simply ineffective.
Moving onto RediMind's next ingredient, Ginkgo Biloba, it's more challenging to unequivocally state that it's dosed too low, as clinical studies have shown 120mg is required to realize its brain benefits. When dosed correctly Ginkgo has been shown to improve cerebral blood flow and provide a degree of neuroprotection. It may even have some benefits for people with cognitive impairment [6]. However, the use of a standardized extract is again critical, something RediMind doesn't appear to do.
RediMind's formula also includes Alpha GPC - and yes you guessed it - it's all but certain to be ineffectively dosed. Clinical studies have shown that 1200mg is required daily [7] to support cholinergic transmission, with higher dosages being necessary for people experiencing age related decline or neurological disorders. This is clearly far below the amount in RediMind as it's many times more than the total amount of all the ingredients combined.
Lastly, but by no means least concerningly, RediMind includes Huperzine A. This is the one ingredient it's credible for RediMind to have dosed in line with the scientific literature as only a small quantity is required to inhibit acetylcholinesterase, which means it effectively works to support and potentially increase acetylcholine levels. So far, so good. However, it's important to be aware that taking Huperzine A on a sustained basis isn't recommended [8] as it's not considered safe to do so. It's generally advised not to take Huperzine A for more than 6 months, but it may be best to avoid it altogether given the uncertainty over its effects [9] when taken regularly.
Assessment of RediMind's Claimed Research Results
Many of RediMind's claims over its efficacy rely on a single study [10]. This was paid for by Nutreance, RediMind's manufactuer and was conducted by PCR Corp. The study claims to report impressive sounding conclusions, such as "85% of participants noticed improved short-term memory". The brand even goes as far as to claim a "51% improvement in memory" is possible by supplementing with RediMind. I would strongly advise treating these claims with skepticism. The study is flawed in a number of ways:
- The study was single-blind, meaning participants knew they were being studied for the effects of a memory supplement and will therefore have been subject to a sizable placebo effect.
- The test used subjective self-reported measurement, meaning it's likely to be inaccurate and again biased by participants expectations.
- It's unclear how the test was conducted.
- The memory test was repeated, meaning practice effects are likely to have influenced the results.
- External factors weren't controlled, such as sleep.
- Sample size was very limited, with just 54 people taking part.
Beyond these issues, there is a further concern. That being that the claim of 51% memory improvement is extremely high, far beyond what might reasonably be expected. Added to which we know the product isn't well formulated and doesn't adhere to the clinical evidence supporting each ingredient used.
Qualitative Review of RediMind's Efficacy
As you may guess if you've read to this point, I went into my trial with RediMind feeling pretty skeptical. The combination of an opaque ingredients list, very few nootropic ingredients in the product's formula, many of which are clearly present in small amounts and arguably a range of over claims relating to the product effectiveness, were all red flags. Nonetheless, I put my logical concerns to one side and trialed the product in good faith and with an open mind.
Before outlining my personal experiences, it's worth briefly recalling the main claims RediMind makes - principally that it improves memory, sharpens focus and provides all-round cognitive support. Over the first few days I have to be honest and say I didn't notice anything at all, absolutely no changes in any way. For most brain supplements I've tested some early signs of improvement are often noticeable after a few days, even though it's fair to say these are generally subtle and take time to build over the course of several weeks. But with RediMind I didn't experience any initial signs that bigger changes were coming.
As I continued to monitor my experiences, I felt no discernible improvements at all for the first 2 weeks. After that point, I felt a very subtle improvement to my mental clarity, but it really was a minor effect and one which could be missed if you're less attuned to the effects of nootropics. Even so, I'd say it was difficult to say with complete confidence that it wasn't more of a placebo effect than from RediMind directly. I continued to monitor things for a full 30 days, in line with RediMind's research protocol to ensure a fair comparison. However, I noticed no further improvements to any aspects of cognitive performance. My memory remained unchanged with small daily occurrences of forgetfulness and my ability focus remained stubbornly unchanged too.
After the full 30 days, I feel I can confidently state that RediMind didn't deliver what was promised. While this wasn't a big surprise given the product's significantly shortcomings, it's still disappointing. Based on my own experience, I wouldn't recommend it to anyone hoping to see significant improvements, the reality is a long way from RediMind's claims.
Estimate of Efficacy Relative To Similar Products
Dosage:
RediMind meager serving size is too small an amount to even fill one regular sized capsule. So while it uses a single capsule per serving, it's likely that much of what's inside is filler material. These fillers are listed as Magnesium Stearate, Microcrystaline Celluloseand Dicalcium Phosphate on RediMind's label.
Quality:
RediMind isn't a high quality product unfortunately. It falls down in a number of areas, namely: too few ingredients, under dosing of almost all ingredients, intentionally hidden ingredient information, marketing over claims and a lack of real world effects.
Efficacy:
Being somewhat generous, I'll attribute a mild improvement in clarity to RediMind, even though it was barely noticeable. Beyond this modest effect, the product didn't do any of the things claimed. The reasons for this is clear, the product is poorly formulated and make claims the product isn't capable of delivering.
Cost:
RediMind is priced at $39.99 per bottle. This isn't as premium priced as some more effective supplements, but the lack of results when using RediMind means it represents very poor value for money in my opinion.
Safety Considerations and Potential Side Effects
The limited range of ingredients used in RediMind combined with the small amounts used means it's very unlikely that any significant side effects will be experienced by most people. I didn't experience any adverse effects during my 30 day trial of the product.
Overall Assessment
Having tested RediMind for 30 days, I can condeidently say it didn't live up to its claims - which are built on a questionable 30 day long study. While the product is marketed as powerful brain booster, the reality is a long way from this. RediMind uses an ineffective formulation, with too few ingredients, almost of of which are not correctly dosed (when compared with clinical research findings). The entire blend uses only five ingredients and a tiny 350mg daily serving size. Some of the ingredients used need more than 350mg each to be effective, let alone as part of a blend shared with other ingredients. The brand isn't open about the amount of each ingredient used. The study which RediMind relies on for its claims is arguably flawed - or at least shouldn't be relied upon for such strong claims - claims which the product simply can't deliver on.
I would strongly recommend ThinkEase instead. It uses many more ingredients and doses them in line with the latest clinical research. Based on my own experiences and analysis of its ingredient profile, you can expect real improvements to memory, focus and mental clarity.
References and Further Reading
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10675414/
- https://examine.com/supplements/bacopa-monnieri/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9415189/
- https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/bacopa-monnieri-benefits
- https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/lions-mane-mushroom#depression-and-anxiety
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5138224/
- https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-1087/alpha-gpc
- https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-764/huperzine-a
- https://www.alzdiscovery.org/cognitive-vitality/ratings/huperzine-a
- https://www.princetonconsumerresearch.com/studies/NUTUSE4M.pdf