
A Comparative Study of Autogenic Training and Progressive Relaxation as Methods for Teaching Clients to Relax
Noboru Takaishi
Sleep and Hypnosis: A Journal of Clinical Neuroscience and Psychopathology 2000;2(3):275-279
Two relaxation methods, Autogenic Training (AT) and Progressive Relaxation (PR), were evaluated and a comparison was made of their effectiveness in helping subjects to relax. One hundred and twenty psychiatric patients with a variety of anxiety-related disorders were randomly assigned to either AT or PR training programs, which were identical in terms of time, frequency of sessions, and trainer. After six weekly training sessions and practice at home, 50 AT and 43 PR subject, all of whom successfully completed the training, were evaluated by a self-report inventory, and by changes in arousal levelsi.e., EMG changes in the frontalis and forearm extensor musclesinduced by practicing the technique during the seventh training session. Results indicated that AT was significantly superior to PR in terms of EMG decreases, as well as in the easiness of the relaxation method for patients with anxiety-related disorders. Possible reasons for these results were discussed.
Keywords:
comparative study, relaxation methods, autogenic training, progressive relaxation, changes in
arousal levels, passive concentration, performance anxiety, variable of culture
comparative study, relaxation methods, autogenic training, progressive relaxation, changes in
arousal levels, passive concentration, performance anxiety, variable of culture
GUIDE FOR AUTHORS
EDITORIAL BOARD
ABOUT JOURNAL
INDEXED IN
AHEAD OF PRINT
ARCHIVES
CURRENT ISSUE
CONTACT US

